I’m going to
become a professional paranormal investigator, since there are clearly no
actual qualifications necessary to do so. I’m pretty sure that I could conduct
a much more scientifically rigorous investigation than many of these “ghost
hunter” shows, even with absolutely no scientific experience whatsoever.
The show I’ve
been watching lately that inspires this is Fact
or Faked: Paranormal Files. Now, I am entertained by many aspects of this
show. I appreciate that they are combining aspects of Mythbusters with the traditional aspects of a paranormal
investigation show. Of course, the problem is that in trying to combine the
two, we really just get a half-assed version of both.
Usually I get
annoyed by these shows’ immense bias and utter lack of “control” of their
experiments. Regardless of what lip service they pay to the idea of
impartiality, most of these ghost hunters are going in looking for the
paranormal. This is why they get all excited about things like orbs and EVPs,
despite the fact that these “phenomena” are obviously pure and utter bull1.
This is also why they put so much stock in testimonials, even though even the
crappiest lawyer or first-year psychology student will tell you how hard it is
to trust eye-witness accounts.
See, I’m a skeptic at heart2. I want to believe, and I want to see some proof, but my logical
brain won’t shut down long enough to let me. Worse yet, I’m also something of a
Doubting Thomas: I would need to experience it for myself to believe it. In my
mind, any photo or video can be faked, and any witness could be lying.
On the other
hand, sometimes these shows get my hackles up3 for entirely
different reasons. Sometimes they don’t do enough to satisfy the criteria that
it is legit. Sure, I might not really
think there’s a ghost in the house, but if you’re going to bother to
investigate it, spend more than one freakin’ night there. In my younger days as
a Cub Scout, I’ve spent a few afternoons fishing, but I’ve never caught
anything. Do I assume there’s no fish in the lake, or the more real possibility
that I’m just a lousy fisherman? There are also episodes of Fact or Faked where they try to recreate
a photo and declare “this is how it was done” even though the pictures look
nothing alike4. Finally, you can argue that even though you could fake it a certain way, it doesn’t
mean it was faked.
The problem with
Forteana—like most of our society—is that people don’t want shades of gray.
They want black or white, real or hoax, skeptic or believer. We need more
people who are skeptical enough to do the rigorous testing that needs to be
done, but who are also open-minded enough to accept the possibility that
something might be real. Skeptics need to stop thinking that they’ve got
everything figured out. Hell, nobody believed gorillas existed before the mid
19th century5. At the same time, believers need to admit
that just because they heard a noise they can’t immediately identify, it
doesn’t make it a ghost.
Finally, to those of you
who still believe in the Loch Ness Monster: Really? How many people have to
come forward and admit to the hoax before you let it go? You have to understand how much damage you're doing the rest of us with your nonsense. A giant dinosaur has not survived in Scotland since prehistoric time, unless he also reproduces by budding. For comparison, I'm more likely to believe that a technologically superior alien race has traveled thousands of light years for the soul purpose of rooting around in the anuses of hillbillies.
I'm probably going to get some hate-mail for that one...
1 For those readers who are not familiar with the
terms: “orbs” are little glowing balls of light that tend to appear on video
and film, and EVP stands for Electronic Voice Phenomenon, when “ghostly” voices
show up on recordings. The problem, of course, is that every stray dust
particle and bug looks like an orb in a camera flash, and EVPs are usually so
distorted and full of static that you can project whatever you want to hear
into the white noise.
2 Even though, in the Fortean community,
“skeptic” is a dirty word.
3 If your hackles stay up for more than four
hours, consult a physician.
4 For those interested enough to look it up,
check out Season 1, Episode 10: Ghostly Guardian. They decided that the ghostly
images were probably just the camera strap, even though the example they show
doesn’t even have the same colors involved.
5 Which is an argument used by many cryptid
believers. Of course, we’ve explored a lot more of the world since then, and
there are a lot less places to hide the large populations necessary to support
Bigfoot as a species. I’m pretty sure if there were thousands of them in Oregon ,
we’d notice. There’d be at least a few dozen of them in Portland ,
although we might not be able to tell them apart from the hipsters.
So, in an aside, I figured out why your footnotes bother me. See, it isn't the fact that you use them, it is that I can't see them without scrolling the whole page, and then scrolling back up. I don't know if this is a controllable problem, but I will get back to you. As it is I read all the foot notes at the end of the post, which really isn't a problem, just an annoyance!
ReplyDeleteThe coolest things on Mythbusters are when they test a myth they thought preposterous and find out they were totally wrong. Think how jubilant they were, for instance, when they watched an elephant being scared by a mouse. It was scientist paydirt, and you know they were running around telling everyone they knew how delighted they were to have been wrong.
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I think most skeptics feel the same way. When you carefully construct an experiment, fully expecting to get one result and then get another, it's thrilling. Scientists love being wrong, because when scientists surprise themselves, great discoveries get made.
So I think, honestly, that Harry Houdini would have been thrilled if he'd gone to a seance and not been able to find evidence of a hoax. I kind of wonder if the reason that so many famous magicians, like James Randi and Penn & Teller, became skeptics while on a quest to find true magic.
I think that the reason a lot of skeptics seem so scornful and jaded is that they've gone out in search of magic and found cruel hoaxes and opportunistic hucksters where ever they looked.
Me, I would love an opportunity to see actual quantifiable evidence of the supernatural for myself. It hasn't happened yet - not before I was a skeptic and not now, but if it does, I will be delighted to have been proved wrong.
When I was younger I actually thought my intense desire to find a ghost/UFO/bigfoot somehow perversely drove them away. And as little as I know about actual science, I'm tickled to do anything that makes me feel like I'm acting like a scientist.
ReplyDelete