Labels

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Realignment: Chaotic Good

     We've covered all the Lawful alignments, and while the next step in progression might be to look at neutrality, I think I want to go to the Chaotic alignments for now. I think it will be helpful to talk about the extremes before we go into the intricacies of neutrality.
     Chaotic Good, in my experience, is one of the more popular choices for the good-aligned PC. It allows a player to be a good guy without feeling constrained by being a goody-two-shoes. Lots of players would rather be Han Solo: the scoundrel loner who has a heart of gold but is just as willing to sneak attack a bounty hunter from under the table if need be.
     Far be it for me to denigrate such lofty ambitions. Let's face it, we'd all be Han Solo if we could. But before we end up with a whole party full of scruffy-looking nerf-herders, let's explore some options.
     Chaos is, of course, the opposite of Law. It is randomness and unpredictability instead of organization and order. For a lot of people, chaos equates to freedom; they are not bound to any kind of code or set of rules.
     But, in many ways, this outlook is closer to neutrality. Chaos is not just the absence of rules, but it is an active opposition to the idea of law. If you simply don't care about obeying the law, you still will end up obeying the law some of the time, just because it ends up working in the same line of your own beliefs. For example, you might not care if it's against the law to kill an unarmed peasant. You're not going to do that anyway, because you're Good. So, by default, you're being lawful.
     This, in my opinion, is also closer to what Robin Hood would be. He is often touted as the quintessential CG character, but I'd argue he's more Neutral Good. He steals from the rich and gives to the poor, not because he wants to abolish the laws of property and ownership, but because he wants to set right a greater evil. He's not against all laws, and I'd assume that if there were a way to set right the corrupt system without having to steal, he'd do that (he does come from a landed noble family, after all, so he does have some stock in "the system").
     One way to play a truly chaotic character is that they don't believe there should be laws. They think people should be free to do whatever they want, without any kind of authority trying to impose their views upon others. You want anarchy, for lack of a better term. Of course, this is a difficult interpretation of Chaos to merge with Good. Because as soon as you have anarchy, you've got people who are going to try to hurt and take advantage of others. A person of Good alignment is hardly going to propose a system where evil acts are so wanton. However, this kind of CG character might be naive, overly-optimistic, or otherwise shortsighted. They might think that the inherent goodness of people will overcome, and that is why it is okay to work towards anarchy.
     Another type of chaotic character is going to be the opposite of the OCD-type of lawful character. This type of chaotic PC might be scatter-brained, ADD, or otherwise unable to think and act in "straight lines." This character is still Good, because they mean well, but maybe they are absent-minded or otherwise mentally disheveled. They are not lawful because they can't seem to get their mind around the rules, and they can't think in an orderly fashion. They're still going to try to do good--they probably don't want to break the law--but they just can't keep it all straight. This person is chaotic more by psychology than by philosophy.
     Just remember: as with Law, Chaos should be defined not by how others view the concept of law and order, but how the PC interprets it. Chaotic Good can offer some wonderful roleplaying opportunities for a player to butt heads against kings and cities, as they try to do good but run afoul of the prescribed rules of the land. Just make sure that the player does not run off with the idea of being Chaotic and lose sight of what it means to be Good.

4 comments:

  1. I have to disagree with the viewpoint that chaotic means anti-law. I'd say that a chaotic character simply has not found a set of rules they care for, and so only follows them due to potential gain, repercussions or happenstance. Its a pretty hard line to draw that chaotic characters must be libertarians and anarchists.

    More like Han Solo, they could be chaotic because the rules didn't work for them, so they simply never adopted any. Over the course of the saga, though, his alignment shifts to a more neutral good as he takes up the Rebel cause - and follows their order's rules as a result.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a good point. I suppose one must be careful to consider more than just the extremes of any alignment. Leaning towards Chaos should count differently than Neutral.

      Delete
  2. The more I read through, the more I feel like you have it right and on my first pass I misunderstood where things fall in the shades of grey. The important part in my mind is to define alignments so that they offer a solid range of possibilities for each combination.

    I've been perplexed by the Robin Hood example all weekend, and I've come to the conclusion that he can be any alignment. And then I challenged myself to figure out how he would feel:

    Lawful Good/Neutral - He truly believes the Rich should pay higher taxes to help the poor, and feels it is his duty to correct the situation. He does not feel like he is breaking the law, but rather enforcing it.

    Neutral Good - He knows it is against the law to steal from the rich, and feels guilt for it - but also knows that the poor really need help. May have a strong utilitarian drive to maximize the benefits of wealth.

    Chaotic Good - "Law? Damn it all! The law has lead to injustice in this land! Give alms to the poor, or I'll take it from you myself."

    True Neutral - "Look, mister. My friends and I don't have money, and you do. You're controlling a system that makes it impossible for us to get anything close to fair. You brought this on yourself." A true neutral Robin Hood then gives his newly found gold away because he feels its in his best interest to gain popular support, as it wins him friends.

    Chaotic Neutral - Steals and gives away money because it was the best way to make a living, and could care less about breaking the law anyway. Gives money back to the community to encourage unrest.

    Evil - Same as above for Lawful/Neutral/Chaotic, but does it out of a deep desire to hurt his fellow nobility and watch them squirm in frustration as their fortunes are given away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very nice. See, this is exactly the kind of thing that gets stuck in my head, too. I start pouring over all the possibilities until I realize that really anybody could be anything, depending on how you spin it.

      Delete